What do you think of AMD vs CommonJS?
Topics
JavaScript
Edit on GitHub
TL;DR
AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition) and CommonJS are two JavaScript module systems. AMD is designed for asynchronous loading of modules, making it suitable for browsers. CommonJS is designed for synchronous loading, making it more suitable for server-side environments like Node.js. AMD uses define
and require
for defining and loading modules, while CommonJS uses module.exports
and require
.
AMD vs CommonJS
Overview
Both AMD and CommonJS are module systems used in JavaScript to manage dependencies and organize code. They serve different purposes and are suited to different environments.
AMD (Asynchronous Module Definition)
Characteristics
- Designed for asynchronous loading of modules
- Primarily used in browser environments
- Uses
define
andrequire
for defining and loading modules
Example
CommonJS
Characteristics
- Designed for synchronous loading of modules
- Primarily used in server-side environments like Node.js
- Uses
module.exports
andrequire
for defining and loading modules
Example
Key differences
Loading mechanism
- AMD: Asynchronous, suitable for browsers where non-blocking operations are crucial.
- CommonJS: Synchronous, suitable for server-side environments where modules are loaded before execution.
Environment suitability
- AMD: Better for client-side applications.
- CommonJS: Better for server-side applications.
Syntax
- AMD: Uses
define
andrequire
. - CommonJS: Uses
module.exports
andrequire
.
Use cases
AMD
- Suitable for web applications where you need to load modules asynchronously to avoid blocking the UI.
- Often used with module loaders like RequireJS.
CommonJS
- Suitable for server-side applications where modules are loaded once at the start.
- The standard module system for Node.js.